While 95% of Philadelphia residents live within a walkable half-mile of a park, the city's outdoor spaces were only ranked 32nd among the 100 largest cities in the country.
The national rankings come from Trust for Public Land, a conservation nonprofit focused on revitalizing urban green spaces. The organization's index ranks cities on five factors it believes makes an excellent public park: acreage, access, investment, amenities and equity.
- MORE NEWS
- Community led study will measure urban heat, air pollution in effort to help fight climate change
- Cumberland County man sentenced to 14 years in prison over online dating scam
- With Supreme Court poised to overrule Roe v. Wade, what would happen to abortion laws in Pa., N.J., Del.
Philadelphia's new ranking represents a significant drop from the previous year's report, which named the city as 19th in the country.
This year's index gave the city a below average ranking in several factors, including size of parks, public and private funding of parks, distribution of park space in low-income communities and access to outdoor amenities like playgrounds and dog parks.
Philadelphia is ranked among the highest in the country in terms of walkable access to parks, including those in low-income areas and communities of color. However, pandemic-related spending constraints have stretched Parks and Recreation budgets nationally, Trust for Public Land officials said.
"Talk to your city council members, state legislatures, and representatives in Washington. Tell them you want more investment in parks, trees, trails, and other nature-based solutions, especially in neighborhoods that need them most," said Bill Lee, senior vice president for policy, advocacy and government relations at Trust for Public Land. "More well-planned, high-quality parks will bring joy to our communities, help people stay healthy, reduce documented equity gaps, and help prevent climate change-associated weather disasters."
Trust for Public Land's scoring index includes both city-provided funding through the budget, as well as private funding and paid volunteer hours. The report found that a total of $73 per capita is spent on Philadelphia's parks – well below the $98 per capita national average.
Broken down, 68% of spending from the city's parks comes from the budget and general fund, while 29% comes from private organizations. Just 1% of spending comes from paid volunteer hours.
While the budget for the Parks and Recreation Department has seen some increases in recent years, an analysis from the City Controller's Office found that funding for the department has remained relatively unchanged since the start of Mayor Kenney's administration, with a $1 per capita annual increase.
The city's proposed budget would spend $42 per resident on Parks and Recreation, according to an interactive tool from the City Controller's Office.
Kathryn Ott Lovell, commissioner for the city's Parks and Recreation Department, said that the COVID-19 pandemic impacted both the projected funding and approved funding for the department, resulting in cuts. She noted that Philadelphia has the most underfunded large city Parks and Recreation Department in the country.
"We were cut dramatically during COVID," Lovell told KYW. "We lost a full 20% of our budget. We only got a little more than half of that back last year."
Still, Lovell points to Trust for Public Land's exclusion of spending for the city's Rebuild program as a possible reason behind the drastic fall in ranking. The Rebuild program was established at the beginning of Kenney's first term as a way to restore 90% of the city's 571 parks. It was one of several initiatives funded through the city's sugary beverage tax.
In 2019, the budget for Parks and Recreation was $66 million. In 2021, that funding dropped to $55 million. The adopted budget for 2022 shows a 13.9% increase in funding for the parks system.
At a City Council budget hearing on Tuesday, officials from the Parks and Recreation Department detailed how they plan to spend $68 million in proposed funding. Among its goals is to increase the amount of year-round programming. Some examples include an expansion of the public pool season, day camps, youth sports and after school programming.
The Department also plans to use the additional funding to provide livable wage increases for both its full-time and seasonal staff, who have been severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Lovell said during the budget hearing that $2.7 million of the proposed funding is earmarked for maintenance of parks and facilities.
For another consecutive year, Washington, D.C. led Trust for Public Land's city park rankings, followed by St. Paul, Minnesota; Arlington, Virginia; Cincinnati, Ohio; and Minneapolis, Minnesota. The full list is available to browse on the organization's websites.